For Energy
Highlight a field note, an incident report or a filing — Energy Mode rewrites it in place, without moving a measurement or adding a cause you did not write.
The problem, honestly
- ✕Technical writing is nobody in the field’s actual job, and it still has to read properly for a regulator.
- ✕General-purpose AI tools round figures and add causation, which turns an observation into an admission.
- ✕Reports written at the end of a long shift get filed as they are, because rewriting them costs another hour.
- ✕Operational detail should not be processed by a tool with no real data policy.
the report shows revenue was up and the team did a good job this quarter
See every mode by name before anything gets selected — no guesswork.
Calibrated for drilling reports, filings, HSE incidents, AFEs and technical memoranda — industry terminology applied where you meant it, and never introduced where you did not.
Depths, pressures, volumes, rates, API numbers, lease and formation names survive exactly. Never rounded, never converted.
JOAs, farmouts and surface use agreements are contract drafting, and are handled as such. Both modes come with every seat.
Text is processed in memory and never stored. Neither of our inference providers trains on it.
“Energy” is four industries in a trench coat
A drilling report and a rate case narrative are not the same document with different nouns. Find your own work below.
Operators — E&P
Drilling and completion reports, Railroad Commission filings, AFEs, JOAs, division orders, monthly production reports.
Every depth, pressure, API number, lease name and formation stays exactly as written. Nothing is rounded to a friendlier figure.
Oilfield services
HSE incident reports, job safety analyses, field tickets, equipment inspection records, near-miss reports.
An incident report gains no cause you did not write. "The valve failed" does not quietly become "the valve failed because the crew skipped the test."
Midstream
Tariff filings, FERC submissions, pipeline integrity reports, measurement disputes, interconnect agreements.
Contract and regulatory language is handled in Legal Mode; technical and operational writing in Energy Mode. Both are included.
Utilities and renewables
Rate case narratives, outage and reliability reports, interconnection studies, environmental compliance submissions.
Regulator-ready register without editorial drift — the tone tightens, the position does not move.
The two things it will not do
Real output, not a mock-up. Field notes in, filing-ready prose out — with the numbers and the uncertainty exactly where you left them.
What you typed
Crew reported a sheen on the water near the platform leg around 1100 hrs. Volume unknown, appears minor. Possibly from the transfer hose but we have not confirmed. Notified USCG at 1215.
What came back
Around 1100 hrs, the crew reported a sheen on the water near the platform leg. The volume is unknown, and it appears to be minor. It may have originated from the transfer hose, but this has not been confirmed. The USCG was notified at 1215.
Note what survived. “May have” and “has not been confirmed” are both still there. A tool optimising for readability would have deleted the second clause as redundant and written the first as fact — and handed you a document that says something you never said.
And it does not touch your numbers
12,847 ft MD stays 12,847 ft MD. Not “approximately 12,800”, not converted to metres, not tidied to three significant figures. The same holds for pressures, mud weights, volumes, rates, dates, lease names, formation names and API numbers.
This sounds obvious until you watch a general-purpose tool round a depth because the sentence scanned better that way. In a Commission filing, that is not a style choice.
Run a real incident report through it before you commit to anything. That is the only test that matters.